The Gadgeteer

Summary

Article

Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement

Cheap Wireless iPAQ Article

Gadgeteer Article by Gary B. Garland

January 07, 2002


After purchasing an iPAQ 12 months ago, my long daily commute with this Pocket PC and Avantgo left me with a feeling of wanting "something more." Not wanting to spend a lot of additional money, I avoided the cost, bulk, and wait for wireless networking alternatives, such as the now defunct Ricochet. These solutions typically require a PC card adapter, the wireless card itself, and hefty monthly subscription fees.

Fast forward 1 year later - I'm still loving every minute with my little buddy. But today, I successfully connected my iPAQ to my shiny new cell phone. The result? True mobile internet access, at the cost of my regular air time (my plan has 300 peak minutes, and 3,200 off peak), at a speed of 14.4k. What does this mean in English? With the purchase of the connecting cables, I now have internet access through my cell phone provider (Verizon) for the cost of a regular cell phone call.

The Nitty Gritty

You have two choices for connecting your cell phone to your iPAQ:
One way is to cobble together a cable and various adapters. I already had a serial autosync cable from the days when I used my little buddy to control my computerized telescope (fodder for another article here!).  As I recall, I paid something like $30 for the cable. In addition to the serial autosync cable (forget about using USB - it won't work), you will need a null modem adapter (I didn't say dull, I said null), and a gender changer. I found a nice compact gender changer at Radio Shack for a few dollars which lets everything fit together nicely.

-or-

You can buy a Compaq (the iPAQ's daddy) cable created just for the purpose you want. It is a RS-232 serial connection cable, Part Number 236251-B21, available from Compaq for $26 clams plus their shipping and handling (which might be close to an additional $26 based on my experience with Compaq). The link is here: http://www.compaq.com/products/handhelds/pocketpc/options/pc_connectivity.html. This $26 cable should remove the need for the null modem adapter, the gender changer, and a rubber band to hold approximately 4 or so feet of extra cable.



Whether you go with my hodge-podge autosync and adapters route, or the smarter Compaq cable method, you will still need a serial cable for your phone, and of course the service from your provider. You will be using the cell phone as a wireless modem, so you need to make sure your phone has this feature. If your phone has a serial cable as an option, and your provider allows it, you should be in business. In my instance, my phone is a fancy-schmancy Motorola 270c - which means I basically overpaid, as the free phone with my wife's plan (the LG-TM510) also has the capability. For Verizon, you can check http://www.verizonwireless.com. For the other providers, well, I wouldn't know where to send you, but checking their home page would be a good place to start.

Next, you need to have digital service in your area. Nowadays, most of these phones switch to analog as a fallback if digital is unavailable or in a fringe area. If you allow your phone to fall back to analog, you'll lose your internet connection for that outing. I guess there are worse things in life... But, if you have a critical connection you'll probably want to switch the phone to digital only, at least for that session.

The service from Verizon is called Mobile Office. They offer various "kits" for several phones which include a phone specific serial cable, and a null modem adapter. The kit differs from the loose cable in that software is included. They did not have a kit for my phone (the price of getting the latest and greatest). That's okay - you knew your little buddy didn't need a driver for this, right?

The Verizon page has a great .pdf file for installation to a Windows CE device - I upgraded my 3630 to Pocket PC 2002 (regrets galore, but that would be yet another article), and although there were few differences, it all worked out in the end. I must concede that I did have a tad bit of trouble getting the connection to work. I had configured my CF modem without much effort, but for some reason my phone kept displaying 111 instead of 777 (for Verizon, your system may differ). I called Verizon, and about 10 minutes later I was running (ok, jogging) at full speed. The problem seemed to be that I needed to create a new connection, rather than rehashing the existing ones. I had also tried setting the iPAQ to dial my ISP, however that is no longer necessary. Configuration is required for e-mailing - basically you just copy the settings from your desktop.



I have not used instant messaging wirelessly, though I have tried it with the CF modem. It should work without incident.

So, what were the costs, and was it worth it? The cable for the phone ran $41 (but actually closer to $60 with phone-configuring software which allows a primitive contacts manager and scheduler - Outlook does a much better job). I already had the autosync cable and adapters, so they were free, otherwise they would have likely cost around $50 - which is roughly double the cost of the shorter, more intelligent Compaq RS232 serial cable. So for about $65 plus the cost of your normal phone calls, you can have wireless internet access on your iPAQ via Verizon. As with all things in life, your mileage may vary. For roughly $65, I can have "emergency" internet access on my iPAQ. I wouldn't post any e-bay ads, download files, or run graphic intensive web pages, if I could help it.
I can, however:
a) fax as necessary - not sure exactly how, but Verizon says I can and I believe them.
b) take digital photos, go presto-chango, pop em into the cf sleeve (or add the appropriate adapter of your choice), and e-mail my photos on the spot.
c) if I get this faxing thing figured out, I can print documents by sending to a fax machine.
d) I can pay bills, order things on-line, etc. while on the go
e) I can use http://www.mapblast.com or the various other mapping sites to get directions. NOW - the old way, with Avantgo, did not make for real time mapping. (Yes, I'm a gadgeteer, and I already ordered my next car with satellite navigation).
f) I can get or send that important e-mail now!

The Future of Wireless

Bluetooth is coming. It's been slow in the U.S., but rest assured it is on it's way, and will likely make quite the splash in the next few years, as it has in Europe. I'm just sorry I have to wait. What is Bluetooth? In a nutshell, it is a wireless protocol. With Bluetooth enabled equipment, you can throw out all those wires within say, a 30 foot range. I overpaid on my Motorola 270c because of 3 reasons. It has a nifty joystick and a big screen for the wow factor, it has a built in speaker phone (gadgeteer's delight), and IT IS THE ONLY U.S. RELEASED CELL PHONE WITH BLUETOOTH CAPABILITY. Sure, that capability will cost you $300 clams right now, which includes a module that goes on the back of the phone and requires a larger rear cover (think iPAQ expansion sleeve), and it includes a PCMCIA Bluetooth card for your notebook. Jump ahead to the forthcoming iPAQ 3870 with Bluetooth built in, and you can start to see where we're heading - Bluetooth phone, Bluetooth iPAQ, and with the included PCMCIA card, you have a Bluetooth computer connection - the wires are quickly disappearing. (Sony has a Bluetooth video camera for Europe, not released in the U.S. - that would mean bluetoothing to your iPAQ, computer, or internet (via Bluetooth phone) - can you start to see the possibilities?

In a nutshell, connecting your iPAQ to the internet via a cell phone is an inexpensive way to surf or make transactions on the net. Though it is slow, you no longer need to lug a notebook as an internet gateway, and it increases the functionality of the already incredibly versatile iPAQ.

Pros:
Inexpensive true internet access

Cons:
Slooooooow - 14.4k, 1/4 the speed of CF card 56k modem
Lots of cables - jump rope anyone?
Can't use Stowaway keyboard or other "bottom connected" accessories at same time

Advertisement
Discussion (0 comments)
Post A Comment

You must be logged in to post a comment.

Login:
Password:

Note: Forum accounts do not work for the new comment system. You may create an account by visiting this page.

Gadgeteer Forums

Post your comments here on the Innopocket Aluminum PDA Case Reviews.

Tungsten C Case

Toshiba e740 Case

Zire 71

HP 2215

HP 1910

Just click the POST REPLY button on this page.[

posted August 07, 2003 17:15:33 PM by Julie

Finally, a hard case for the C! Can you do some testing to see if the case interferes with the WiFi signal?

Thanks for your great reviews, as always!

posted August 07, 2003 23:37:42 PM by cfifer

When I got my Innopocket I had to bend the cover slightly to even get the case to open it was sealed shut so tight. Also, the metal on the top left of the case is overlapping some. But for the money this is a great case. I can throw it in my pocket or my laptop bag and don't have to worry about it getting damaged.

Even though I like the Innopocket case, I think now that Vaja has an Ivolution for the T|C I'm going to move up to that. You may see my metal case on ebay soon :)

posted August 08, 2003 11:11:36 AM by jimg72

I couldn't put up with having to remove the PDA from the case to charge it. Synching isn't a problem because I can do that over WiFi. Why don't the case makers think about the cradle/charger issue? Or perhaps they do and have decided that it's too difficult to get around and we just have to take the thing out every time. Now if Palm etc. made a charger like the one on my Panasonic shaver then that would be good. The shaver uses induction to charge the batteries so it just needs to fit into a coil with no plugs or connectors. Palm, are you listening?

posted August 10, 2003 17:17:58 PM by pepe

I returned the case for a serveral of reasons. One is using the thumboard is impossible to do while balancing the case in your hands. Two, the case is two slipper and would drop easily.Lastly I couldn't us the 3-1 innopocket sync /charge/sd card cable I purchased. You need to the and the back of the TC open to use teh cable.

:(

posted August 10, 2003 20:37:16 PM by Matt

[ 8 more comments on this article -- join the discussion ]