The Gadgeteer

Summary

Gadget Review

Advertisement
Review at a glance

Manufacturer: iRock

Price: $29.99

Pros:
  • Ability to listen to music over your stereo system without using wires or
  • adapters
  • Inexpensive
  • Portable
Cons:
  • None
Categories: More reviews like this one:

[discuss this review (0 comments so far)]

Advertisement
Advertisement

iRock! Wireless Music Adapter

Gadgeteer Hands On Review by Judie Hughes

May 23, 2002

Product Requirements:
Device:
Almost any portable music device with a headphone jack and an FM radio

It is an inevitable thing that you may have the "world's greatest" stereo system in your car or house; but the music that you want to hear at some point and time will happen to be in a format that you can't listen to over that particular system.

In the past, listening to music from an alternative source might have involved buying a cassette adapter that plugged into your device - with a cable hanging from your device to the cassette player of your stereo. But what if you didn't have a cassette player?

Enter the irock!, a clever little device that can assist you in listening to music from virtually any portable player that has a headphone jack, by porting it to any player that has a built in FM radio.


Photo courtesy of myirock.com

The irock! consists of a small (2.0" x 3.0" x 1.0") plastic transmitter that includes a flexible 7" antenna. The end of the antenna is actually a 1/8" stereo audio input connector. Two AAA batteries will power the device for up to 20 hours, according to the website.

Although it isn't necessarily made to be held in your hand while being used, I found the irock! to be pleasant to hold, and the rubber trim made it feel rather cool.

The large black button on the front allows you turn the transmitter on and off, and a bright red light will glow while the transmitter is turned on.

Once the irock! is plugged into your electronic device, you simply tune your FM radio to any of the following stations: 88.1, 88.3, 88.5, or 88.7 MHz. You will also need to select the frequency from the slider on the right side of the irock!, and then you can enjoy your music - that's all you have to do!

The first obvious application for the irock! would be for listening to MP3s from your PDA in the car.

Here you can see my E-200 being used, but if you are an iPAQ owner that happens to have a PCMCIA sleeve and a 5GB Datapak...well, you can see the possibilities. How many hours of music does 5 GB translate to? ;0)

I tested the irock! by placing it all over my fiancé's car - including the backseat - and true to the manufacturers claim of 10-30 feet, I had no problem getting a clear signal over the car's stereo.

Obviously you aren't limited to just PDAs, though. You can also use the irock! with CD, cassette and mini disc players, as well as any other player with a headphone jack.

A less obvious application might be playing music directly from your laptop through a stereo system.

It might be cool to use the irock! with a voice GPS system, too...


Here you can see the irock! being used with our home theater system. If you are the adventurous type that would like to DJ a party from your PDA, this would be the easy way to do it.

The irock! sent a strong signal from 10 feet away, but I did find that the quality seemed better the closer the irock! was to the tuner.

The irock! is a clever way to effortlessly listen to alternative music sources over your stereo system - either in your home or car. When you aren't using it, it is small enough to stow in the glove box or door pocket, and it seems rugged enough to withstand reasonable daily abuse.

With it's recently lowered price, the irock! is affordable and convenient.

Price: $29.99

Pros:
Ability to listen to music over your stereo system without using wires or adapters
Inexpensive
Portable

Cons:
None

Advertisement
Review Summary

Manufacturer: iRock

Price: $29.99

More reviews like this one:
Pros:
  • Ability to listen to music over your stereo system without using wires or
  • adapters
  • Inexpensive
  • Portable
Cons:
  • None
Categories:
Discussion (0 comments)
Post A Comment

You must be logged in to post a comment.

Login:
Password:

Note: Forum accounts do not work for the new comment system. You may create an account by visiting this page.

Gadgeteer Forums

I bought one, and within 24 hours took it back.

My biggest (and pretty much main) complaint was that the screen doesn't re-orient itself the way I would like.

When open in 'laptop' mode, I didn't mind it too much. But when moving it to 'PDA' mode (screen rotated and folded back down), the screen stays horizontal. And the Graffiti area is vertical. ICK!

Also, battery life is DISMAL. Manual says 2.5 hours if you do nothing but solid Wi-Fi with the backlight off (pretty sure it was off). I got to less than half a charge in 25 minutes with backlight on.

I decided to take it back and swapped for a Tungsten C. Wi-Fi times are much better.

posted September 20, 2003 23:53:47 PM by aybara

I agree about the lack of a portrait mode. What was Sony thinking??? :rolleyes:

The vertical Graffiti area feels very awkward to me. As a lefty, I was really hating it till I found that I could switch it to left side of the screen. Now I just dislike it intensely.

To Sony's credit, the audio quality (listening to MP3's) through earphones is outstanding!

posted September 21, 2003 10:07:52 AM by Julie

So far my battery life has been okay - but I have mainly been loading programs and reading eBooks on it at half-brightness. Which brings me to the jog-dial, or in this case jog-wheel. It is horrible! Placed in an impossible location - I honestly can find no comfortable one-handed way to hold the UX and flick the wheel (for turning pages). IMO, the jog-wheel should have been on the side where the on/off/hold slider is. :(

Judie :0)

posted September 21, 2003 10:51:17 AM by Judie

Ack! I hate typing in a reply, then having my browser time out. Now I need to try and remember what I said. Forgive me if it isn't as eloquent as it was the first time. :)

The jog wheel gave me issues, especially when trying to click it. I usually ended up giving it a nice spin. Also, my problem with Graffiti entry in general was the included stylus. It being collapsible, and small, led to me having it collapse on me quite a bit. This didn't happen to my wife, so I chalked it up to having large hands.

I will agree that the audio from the Sony was excellent, but since I have an MP3 player for listening to music, I don't find myself minding the mono output of the Tungsten C.

posted September 21, 2003 13:54:10 PM by aybara

I wasn't that impressed with the UX50 at first because the screen was so small compared to the NX80 that I exchanged for it. However after now having the device for 10 days I can say that I think I have found a device that will keep me happy for quite some time (at least until Palm OS6 devices come out:D ).

In the 10 days, I have never once used Grafitti to input anything and rely solely on the keyboard. I mean this is why I wanted a device with a thumb keyboard so why use the strange Grafitti area? While the display is a bit small, it is very evenly lit, bright, and images and photos looks so much better than on a Palm device. Multimedia rocks on the device with great sound output and fast video playback. The keyboard is very nice, but Sony could have done a better job with the drivers so we could simulate a OK, Done, Cancel button press. I know sometimes the Back button works for Cancel, but I want to leave the stylus in its silo all the time.

My battery life is absolutely miserable and I am going to CompUSA tonight to exchange my unit and get my 10% off refund (saving me $70 so I can buy the extended battery). I read that pt and others were getting decent battery life, but mine drops 50% after about 25 minutes of Bluetooth surfing and regularly is down in the teens within 2 hours. I have NEVER had to charge a PDA as much as this and I feel it is unacceptable for a connected device since you are trying to stay away from cables and not have to walk around with your charger. Hopefully, the replacement has a better battery life.

posted September 22, 2003 13:34:24 PM by palmsolo

[ 10 more comments on this review -- join the discussion ]